Dr Luigi Phd, on 05 March 2014 - 01:41 PM, said:
I got to looking at the Panther II and the E-50 and comparing it to the similarities of the Panther vs Panther II and I think that the short L/56 8.8cm cannon should be removed from the Panther II. If you were to move the L71 8.8cm cannon off the last optional package and instead bring down the L/100 8.8cm for the last optional package on the Panther II, I think it would fit much better into the Sniper/Flanker role it was designed for.
I am opening this up for a friendly debate and would like to hear some different opinions.
I disagree that the 88L/100 is necessary for the Panther II, the 88L/71 is good enough. I would remove the 88L/56 and replace it in its package with the 75L/100 though.
Edit—Because if you want to use the 75L/100 over the 88L/71 you can't with the current configuration.
Edited by Matthew J35U5, 05 March 2014 - 06:45 PM.
Amazing Royce, on 05 November 2014 - 07:09 AM, said:
Please, I play OP TD's all the time, but I avoid autoloaders. I gotta have standards ya know.
Community Tanking Guides
"I only post in GD because that's the only section people read, and I only read GD because that's the only forum people post in"-Someone who is part of the problem